Coughlan and Jack
[2014] FCCA 2442
•23 October 2014
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| COUGHLAN & JACK | [2014] FCCA 2442 |
| Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Application dismissed. |
| Applicant: | MARK DESMOND COUGHLAN |
| Respondent: | RAYMOND JACK (DIRECTOR) GLADSTONE CC PTY LTD |
| File Number: | BRG 435 of 2014 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Baumann |
| Hearing date: | 24 September 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 24 September 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 23 October 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Self Represented |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Self Represented |
ORDERS
The Application filed 15 May 2014 is dismissed.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRG 435 of 2014
| MARK DESMOND COUGHLAN |
Applicant
And
| RAYMOND JACK (DIRECTOR) GLADSTONE CC PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The Applicant claims the sum of $5897.15 of unpaid annual leave (165.14 hours at $35.71/hour), which he says was payable on cessation of his employment with the Respondent on 21 January 2011.
The Applicant relies on the evidence of the final pay advice dated 24 January 2011 which asserts an outstanding leave entitlement of 165.14 hours.
The Respondent has produced payroll advice records for the period from 1 January 2004 to 24 January 2011. That evidence establishes, to the Court’s satisfaction, that 1025.95 hours of annual leave was paid, which exceeds the entitlement.
The Court finds that the final pay slip which shows 165.14 hours leave outstanding is an error and accepts the evidence produced to the court by the Respondent.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Baumann
Date: 23 October 2014
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0