Cottrell v Ross

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

COTTRELL

v

ROSS

[2018] HCASL 387
M119/2018

  1. The applicant seeks the removal into this Court of a cause pending in the County Court of Victoria.  Although that cause involves a matter arising under the Constitution, the application does not disclose any reason to interfere with the ordinary appellate process. An order under s 40 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) to remove the cause into this Court would therefore be inappropriate.

  2. Pursuant to r 26.07.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

S.J. Gageler
5 December 2018 		P.A. Keane
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Cottrell v Ross and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] HCASL 387
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Cottrell v Ross, the applicant, Cottrell, sought to have a cause that was pending in the County Court of Victoria removed to the High Court of Australia. The matter involved an issue that arose under the Constitution of Australia, but the application did not provide any justification for interfering with the normal appellate process. The case was brought under section 40 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), which allows for the removal of a cause from a State or Territory court to the High Court.

The legal issues in the case focused on whether the High Court should exercise its discretion to remove the matter from the County Court, given that the application did not provide sufficient grounds for such a transfer. The Court needed to consider if the case met the criteria for removal under section 40 of the Judiciary Act and whether there were any exceptional circumstances that warranted interference with the usual appellate process.

The High Court determined that the application did not disclose any reason that justified the removal of the cause from the County Court. The Court held that the matter should proceed through the ordinary appellate process, and that there were no exceptional circumstances present that would warrant the exercise of the Court's discretion to remove the cause. The Court then directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application, in accordance with rule 26.07.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The decision was made on the basis that the applicant had not provided any compelling reasons to justify the transfer of the matter to the High Court.

In summary, the High Court dismissed the application for the removal of the cause from the County Court of Victoria to the High Court, as the applicant had not provided any grounds for interfering with the ordinary appellate process. The Court's decision was based on the lack of exceptional circumstances or compelling reasons to warrant the exercise of the Court's discretion under section 40 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.