Costi Cohen Pty Ltd v Bo (No.2)

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Costi Cohen Pty Ltd v Bo (No.2) [2025] NSWDC 385
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 26 September 2025
Decision date: 26 September 2025
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Habib SC DCJ
Decision:

(a) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $166,100;

(b) Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff the amount of $17,137.94 on account of interest calculated in accordance with section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) for the period 14 June 2024 to 12 September 2025.

(c) The defendant's cross-claim filed 19 May 2024 be dismissed.

(d) The costs of 8 October 2024 and 4 April 2025 be costs in the cause.

(e) The defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the cross-claim as agreed or assessed.

Freezing Order

(f) On the plaintiff, by its solicitor, continuing to give the usual undertaking as to damages set out in Schedule A to the Penal Order, Order 5 of the Orders of the Court on 3 October 2024 (as varied by Orders 1-2 of the Orders of the Court of 8 October 2024) making orders 1 to 17 (noting there are no orders 8 or 9) of the Penal order set out in attachment A to the Orders of 3 October 2024, is extended until further order.

Catchwords:

COSTS – apportionment – indemnity costs

Legislation Cited:

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law

Contracts ReviewAct 1980 (NSW)

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r20.65 r42.1

Cases Cited:

Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Sons Developments Pty Ltd (No 2)

Michael Hill Jeweller (Australia) Pty Ltd v Gispac Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 274

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Costi Cohen Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)
Yin Bo (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr P Folino-Gallo (Plaintiff)
Mr P Reynolds (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Hitch Advisory (Plaintiff)
MLH Lawyers (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2024/356522
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

  1. On 12 September 2025, the Court delivered judgment (“Principal Judgment”) in these proceedings finding that Mr Bo was liable to Costi Cohen in the amount of $166,100 and ordered that the parties provide to the Court:

  1. orders giving effect to the judgment; and

  2. any submissions on costs.

  1. The parties provided competing orders and provided submissions on costs. Notwithstanding the form of the orders made on 12 September 2025, the parties agreed that the Court could resolve the question of the final orders to be made, including in relation to costs, on the papers.

  2. Terms used in this judgment carry the same meaning as they did in the Principal Judgment.

Orders giving effect to the judgment

  1. Each party agreed that to give effect to the judgment, at least, the following orders should be made:

  1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $166,100;

  2. Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff the amount of $17,137.94 on account of interest calculated in accordance with s. 100 of the Civil…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Costi Cohen Pty Ltd v Bo (No.2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] NSWDC 385
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Costi Cohen Pty Ltd v Bo (No.2), the plaintiff, Costi Cohen Pty Ltd, sought damages against the defendant, Bo, for breach of contract. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff argued that the defendant had failed to meet contractual obligations, leading to financial losses. The defendant, in turn, filed a cross-claim against the plaintiff.

The court was required to determine several legal issues, including whether the plaintiff had indeed suffered damages as a result of the defendant's actions and if so, the extent of those damages. Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate apportionment of costs between the parties, including whether indemnity costs should apply to either party. The court also needed to rule on the validity and enforcement of a freezing order affecting the plaintiff, which was initially imposed to prevent the dissipation of assets.

The court found in favour of the plaintiff, awarding them $166,100 in damages. The court also ordered the defendant to pay interest and dismissed the defendant's cross-claim. The court emphasised that the defendant was to cover all costs of the proceedings, including those related to the cross-claim, either as agreed or assessed. The freezing order was extended to ensure continued protection of the plaintiff's assets.

The court ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff $17,137.94 for interest accrued from 14 June 2024 to 12 September 2025. The costs of the proceedings on 8 October 2024 and 4 April 2025 were to be borne by the parties as per the cause. The freezing order was extended until further notice, with the plaintiff required to maintain the usual undertaking regarding damages.

Orders

Orders of the court

(a) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $166,100;

(b) Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff the amount of $17,137.94 on account of interest calculated in accordance with section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) for the period 14 June 2024 to 12 September 2025.

(c) The defendant's cross-claim filed 19 May 2024 be dismissed.

(d) The costs of 8 October 2024 and 4 April 2025 be costs in the cause.

(e) The defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the cross-claim as agreed or assessed.

Freezing Order

(f) On the plaintiff, by its solicitor, continuing to give the usual undertaking as to damages set out in Schedule A to the Penal Order, Order 5 of the Orders of the Court on 3 October 2024 (as varied by Orders 1-2 of the Orders of the Court of 8 October 2024) making orders 1 to 17 (noting there are no orders 8 or 9) of the Penal order set out in attachment A to the Orders of 3 October 2024, is extended until further order.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.