FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| COSTELLO & COSTELLO | [2016] FamCA 1113 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – PARENTING – Where there is a trial of the father spending unsupervised time with the children – where supervision requirement by paternal grandparents continue, but thereafter cease – where fathers poor boundaries have now abated to the point where unsupervised time should be trialled – where father is to undergo fortnightly blood testing |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60CC |
| Jopson & Lilwall [2016] FamCAFC 262 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Costello |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Costello |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Gray |
| FILE NUMBER: | CSC | 787 | of | 2014 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 22 December 2016 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Cairns |
| PLACE HEARD: | Cairns |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Tree J |
| HEARING DATE: | 6 December 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| THE APPLICANT: | In person |
| THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
| SOLICITORS FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER : | Susan Gray |
Orders
THAT BY CONSENT UNTIL FURTHER ORDER, THE ORDERS OF 12 APRIL 2016 ARE VARIED SO THAT:
The children are to spend time with the father from 8:00am each Monday until 4:30pm each Thursday.
The mother be permitted to take the children to Melbourne in the period between 4 and 10 January 2017, and in the event that she does so, then the father’s time which he would otherwise spend with the children under these orders is suspended.
Until Monday 2 January 2017, the supervision requirement by the paternal grandparents contained in Order 10 of the 12 April 2016 consent orders, should continue.
The father is to undergo fortnightly blood testing, and to produce the results of those blood tests to the Independent Children's Lawyer, so as to demonstrate that he remains compliant with his medication regime.
B (born … 2003) is permitted to attend upon a counsellor of the mother’s choosing, and the parties are to do all things necessary to facilitate her attendance.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
On and from 2 January 2017, the supervision requirement contained in Order 10 of the Orders of 12 April 2016 cease to apply to the time the children spend with the father.
Changeovers of the children are to take place at McDonalds F Town.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY CONSENT THAT:
A Child Inclusive Conference be conducted at 9:00am on Wednesday 25 January 2017 in Cairns and a report of that conference be provided to the parties.
The further hearing of this matter be adjourned to 2:00pm on Monday 13 February 2017 in Cairns.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Costello & Costello has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law…
Continue reading Costello and Costello
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Costello and Costello [2016] FamCA 1113
- Case
- [2016] FamCA 1113
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the terms of varied orders that would govern the children's time with each parent, including provisions for travel to Melbourne and the continuation or cessation of supervision by paternal grandparents. Further issues included the father's obligation to undergo blood testing to demonstrate compliance with his medication, and the facilitation of counselling for one of the children. The court also had to address the location for changeovers and the scheduling of a Child Inclusive Conference and a further hearing.
Tree J, by consent of the parties, made a series of orders varying the previous arrangements. These included specific times for the children to spend with the father, permission for the mother to take the children to Melbourne during a specified period with a suspension of the father's time, and the continuation of supervision by paternal grandparents until a set date. The father was ordered to undergo fortnightly blood testing to confirm adherence to his medication regime, and the mother was permitted to arrange counselling for one child. Supervision by the paternal grandparents was to cease from a specified date, and changeovers were to occur at a designated location. The court also ordered a Child Inclusive Conference and adjourned the matter for a further hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
THAT BY CONSENT UNTIL FURTHER ORDER, THE ORDERS OF 12 APRIL 2016 ARE VARIED SO THAT:
1.
The children are to spend time with the father from 8:00am each Monday until 4:30pm each Thursday.
2.
The mother be permitted to take the children to Melbourne in the period between 4 and 10 January 2017, and in the event that she does so, then the father’s time which he would otherwise spend with the children under these orders is suspended.
3.
Until Monday 2 January 2017, the supervision requirement by the paternal grandparents contained in Order 10 of the 12 April 2016 consent orders, should continue.
4.
The father is to undergo fortnightly blood testing, and to produce the results of those blood tests to the Independent Children's Lawyer, so as to demonstrate that he remains compliant with his medication regime.
5.
B (born … 2003) is permitted to attend upon a counsellor of the mother’s choosing, and the parties are to do all things necessary to facilitate her attendance.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
6.
On and from 2 January 2017, the supervision requirement contained in Order 10 of the Orders of 12 April 2016 cease to apply to the time the children spend with the father.
7.
Changeovers of the children are to take place at McDonalds F Town.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY CONSENT THAT:
8.
A Child Inclusive Conference be conducted at 9:00am on Wednesday 25 January 2017 in Cairns and a report of that conference be provided to the parties.
9.
The further hearing of this matter be adjourned to 2:00pm on Monday 13 February 2017 in Cairns.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.