Coskun v The King

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

COSKUN

v

THE KING

[2024] HCASL 305
S110/2024

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Kirk JA, Wilson and Ierace JJ) made on 10 May 2024 dismissing an appeal against conviction and sentence for murder.

  2. The proposed appeal does not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time.

  3. Special leave to appeal is refused.

    Gageler CJ
    Gordon J
    Edelman J
    Steward J 
    Gleeson J
    Jagot J
    Beech-Jones J

    7 November 2024

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Coskun v The King and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] HCASL 305
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Coskun, the applicant, sought an extension of time to apply for special leave to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales. The Court of Criminal Appeal had dismissed an appeal against his conviction and sentence for murder. The High Court was tasked with determining whether an extension of time should be granted to allow the applicant to seek special leave.

The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether the proposed appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The Court had to assess the merits of the appeal and decide if there were grounds that could potentially lead to a reversal of the lower court's decision. Additionally, the Court needed to consider whether granting an extension of time would be futile.

In its decision, the High Court found that the proposed appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success. The Court concluded that the appeal lacked the necessary merit to warrant the grant of special leave. As a result, the Court held that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. Consequently, the application for an extension of time was refused, and special leave to appeal was denied.

The High Court ordered that special leave to appeal be refused. The Court did not grant the applicant an extension of time to seek special leave from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.