COSKUN
v
THE KING
[2024] HCASL 305
S110/2024
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Kirk JA, Wilson and Ierace JJ) made on 10 May 2024 dismissing an appeal against conviction and sentence for murder.
The proposed appeal does not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J7 November 2024
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Coskun v The King and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 305
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether the proposed appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The Court had to assess the merits of the appeal and decide if there were grounds that could potentially lead to a reversal of the lower court's decision. Additionally, the Court needed to consider whether granting an extension of time would be futile.
In its decision, the High Court found that the proposed appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success. The Court concluded that the appeal lacked the necessary merit to warrant the grant of special leave. As a result, the Court held that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. Consequently, the application for an extension of time was refused, and special leave to appeal was denied.
The High Court ordered that special leave to appeal be refused. The Court did not grant the applicant an extension of time to seek special leave from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.