FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Coshott [2013] FCA 156
Citation: Coshott v Coshott [2013] FCA 156 Parties: JAMES COSHOTT and LJILJANA COSHOTT v ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE; JOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT; JAMES COSHOTT, LJILJANA COSHOTT, ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and SCHILOTSZKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED File number: NSD 1412 of 2009 Judge: BUCHANAN J Date of judgment: 25 February 2013 Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Date of hearing: 25 February 2013 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No catchwords Number of paragraphs: 3 Counsel for the Applicants: The First Applicant appeared in person for the Applicants Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent appeared in person Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Johnson Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Sally Nash & Co Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1412 of 2009
BETWEEN: JAMES COSHOTT
First ApplicantLJILJANA COSHOTT
Second ApplicantROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
First RespondentJOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE
Second RespondentJOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT
Cross-ClaimantAND: JAMES COSHOTT
First Cross-RespondentLJILJANA COSHOTT
Second Cross-RespondentROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
Third Cross-RespondentSCHILOTSZKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED
Fourth Cross-Respondent
JUDGE:
BUCHANAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
25 FEBRUARY 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Official Trustee be substituted for John Christopher Burke as second respondent and cross-claimant in proceedings NSD 1412 of 2009.
THE COURT DIRECTS THAT:
2.The solicitors for the former trustee notify the Official Trustee, within three working days, of the change of party in those proceedings.
3.The matter be listed for further directions at 9:30 am on 8 March 2013.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1412 of 2009
BETWEEN: JAMES COSHOTT
First ApplicantLJILJANA COSHOTT
Second ApplicantROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
First RespondentJOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE
Second RespondentJOHN CHRISTOPHER BURKE AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT
Cross-ClaimantAND: JAMES COSHOTT
First Cross-RespondentLJILJANA COSHOTT
Second Cross-RespondentROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT
Third Cross-RespondentSCHILOTSZKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED
Fourth Cross-Respondent
JUDGE:
BUCHANAN J
DATE:
25 FEBRUARY 2013
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Earlier this morning, I made orders the effect of which was to accept the resignation of the second respondent/cross-claimant as trustee of the bankrupt estate of the first respondent/third cross-respondent. I did not appoint another trustee in substitution. The effect of s 160 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) is that the Official Trustee is, by force of that section, now the trustee of the estate. I order that the Official Trustee be substituted for John Christopher Burke as second respondent and cross-claimant in proceedings NSD 1412 of 2009.
I direct that the solicitors for the former trustee notify the Official Trustee, within three working days, of the change of party in those proceedings.
I list that matter for further directions at 9:30 am on 8 March 2013.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Buchanan. Associate:
Dated: 1 March 2013
- AGLC
- Coshott v Coshott [2013] FCA 156
- Case
- [2013] FCA 156
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the resignation of the second respondent as trustee of the bankrupt estate necessitated the substitution of the Official Trustee in his place. This was determined by examining the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), which governs the appointment and resignation of trustees in bankruptcy matters. Specifically, section 160 of the Act provides that upon the resignation of a trustee, the Official Trustee automatically becomes the trustee of the estate, unless another trustee is appointed in substitution.
Justice Buchanan, who presided over the case, found that the resignation of the second respondent indeed necessitated the substitution of the Official Trustee as the trustee of the bankrupt estate. The judge accepted the resignation and ordered that the Official Trustee be substituted for John Christopher Burke as the second respondent and cross-claimant in the proceedings. The judge also directed that the solicitors for the former trustee notify the Official Trustee of the change of party within three working days and listed the matter for further directions on 8 March 2013.
In summary, the court ruled that the resignation of the second respondent as trustee of the bankrupt estate of the first respondent resulted in the automatic substitution of the Official Trustee as the new trustee. The court made an order to this effect and directed the necessary notifications and listing of the matter for further directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.