Corica v Shire of Mundaring [No 2]

[2017] WASCA 212

JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

TITLE OF COURT :   THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA)

CITATION:   CORICA -v- SHIRE OF MUNDARING [No 2] [2017] WASCA 212

CORAM:   BUSS P

MAZZA JA

HEARD:   ON THE PAPERS

DELIVERED          :   6 SEPTEMBER 2017

PUBLISHED           :  15 NOVEMBER 2017

FILE NO/S:   CACR 134 of 2017

BETWEEN:   SALVATORE CORICA

MARILYN KAYE CORICA
Appellants

AND

SHIRE OF MUNDARING
Respondent

ON APPEAL FROM:

Jurisdiction              :  SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Coram  :TOTTLE J

File No  :SJA 1073 of 2016, SJA 1092 of 2016, SJA 1094 of 2016

Catchwords:

Criminal law - Practice and procedure - Application to adjourn leave application hearing

Legislation:

Nil

Result:

Application dismissed

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

Appellants:     In person

Respondent:     Mr A Wadham

Solicitors:

Appellants:     In person

Respondent:     McLeods Barristers & Solicitors

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Corica v Shire of Mundaring [2017] WASCA 211

Corica v Throssell [No 2] [2017] WASCA 210

1. REASONS OF THE COURT:    These reasons should be read in conjunction with the reasons in Corica v Shire of Mundaring (CACR 134 of 2017)[1] and concern an application made by the appellants filed on 5 September 2017 to adjourn the hearing of the abovementioned matters listed for 14 September 2017.  A similar application was made in Corica v Throssell [No 2].[2]  The application was dismissed by us on 6 September 2017.  Our reasons for doing so are identical to the reasons we expressed in Corica v Throssell [No 2].

   [1] Corica v Shire of Mundaring [2017] WASCA 211.

   [2] Corica v Throssell [No 2] [2017] WASCA 210.