FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CORELLI & BERONI | [2019] FamCA 911 |
| FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – BINDING FINANCIAL AGREEMENT – Where the wife seeks to either set aside or declare void a Binding Financial Agreement entered into with the husband and signed by the wife on 31 March 2011 – Issue of what extent the wife could communicate in, or understand, written and spoken English at 31 March 2011 – Where the court is satisfied the wife was not proficient in English on the day she signed the Binding Financial Agreement – Where the court is not satisfied that the wife was unaware of the essential nature of what she was signing on 31 March 2011 – Where the wife’s claim based on non est factum fails –Where the wife’s claim for duress fails – Where the wife was in a position of special disadvantage at the time she signed the Binding Financial Agreement – Where the advice given by the wife’s solicitor was not sufficient to remedy that special disadvantage – Where the husband insisted that the Binding Financial Agreement be signed by the wife knowing her special disadvantage – Where the wife entered into the Binding Financial Agreement as a result of unconscionability and undue influence – Where the wife’s claim to have the Binding Financial Agreement set aside succeeds. |
| Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 97 and s 100 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 90G, 90UJ and 90UM |
| Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Bruce Walter Gardiner & Anor (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Bond v Walford (1886) 32 Ch D 238 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Jacara Pty Ltdv Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (2000) 106 FCR 51 LC & TC (1998) FLC 92-803; [1998] FamCA 47 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 at 200-202 Rowell v Rowell (1900) 1 QB 9 Summers v The Commonwealth (1918) 25 CLR 144; [1918] HCA 33 Taylor & Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422; [1983] HCA 5 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) Fam LR 559; [2017] HCA 49 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Corelli |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Beroni |
| FILE NUMBER: | ADC | 1771 | of | 2016 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 2 December 2019 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Cairns |
| PLACE HEARD: | Adelaide |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Tree J |
| HEARING DATE: | 26, 27, 28, February, 1, 2 March, 16 April, 22, 23, 24 October and 8 November 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Whitington QC together with Mr McGinn |
| SOLICITORS FOR THE APPLICANT: | Angela Ferdinandy Solicitor |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Livesey QC together with Mr Bullock |
| SOLICITORS FOR THE RESPONDENT: | JKR Lawyers |
Orders
That the Binding Financial Agreement between the parties dated 7 April 2011, be set aside.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Corelli & Beroni has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s…
Continue reading Corelli & Beroni
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Corelli & Beroni [2019] FamCA 911
- Case
- [2019] FamCA 911
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Binding Financial Agreement was valid and enforceable, or if it ought to be set aside on grounds that would render it void or voidable.
Tree J ordered that the Binding Financial Agreement between the parties dated 7 April 2011 be set aside.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the Binding Financial Agreement between the parties dated 7 April 2011, be set aside.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.