District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cook v Siperki [2022] NSWDC 665 Hearing dates: 31 October 2022-3 November 2022 Date of orders: 3 November 2022 Decision date: 03 November 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: 1. I give verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $1,086,414.48.
2. I order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on the ordinary basis to 14 September 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Catchwords: CIVIL – PERSONAL INJURY – MOTOR ACCIDENT – LIABILITY – QUANTUM – CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE – Defendant’s failure to keep a proper lookout when exiting driveway onto main road – Motorcyclist exceeding speed limit when travelling on main road – Inability of motorcyclist to take proper evasive action prior to collision – Major personal injury to the right leg.
CIVIL – PERSONAL INJURY – MOTOR ACCIDENT – QUANTUM – Economic loss – Non-economic loss – Inability of the Plaintiff to regain proper employment in fields with relevant experience – Inability of Plaintiff to find suitable work.
Legislation Cited: Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)
Road Rules 2014 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Nominal Defendant v Green [2017] NSWCA 280
Podbrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34
Texts Cited: Nil.
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff – Jason Matthew Cook
Defendant – Nicole SiperkiRepresentation: Counsel:
Plaintiff - Mr B. Dooley SC and Mr S. Hunt
Defendant – Mr J. Turnbull SC and Ms S. Warren
Solicitors:
Plaintiff – Don Cameron & Associates
Defendant – Holman Webb Lawyers
File Number(s): 2021/00364314 Publication restriction: Nil.
Judgment
Judgment
Background
Liability
Geography
Preceding the collision
The collision
The Defendant’s description of the collision
The Plaintiff’s description of the collision
Mr Bathis’ description of the collision
Consideration
Quantum
Plaintiff’s background
The Plaintiff’s speeding and truck driving
The Plaintiff’s predominant work
The Plaintiff’s medical history
Consideration
Order
Background
-
HIS HONOUR: The Plaintiff, Mr Jason Matthew Cook, brings an action for damages for personal injury which he sustained when the motorcycle he was riding collided with a motor vehicle being driven by the Defendant, Ms Nicole Stephanie Siperki. The collision occurred on Sunday 11 August 2019 on Dallinger Road, East Lavington.
-
The proceedings have been highly contentious. One result of the injuries sustained by the Plaintiff is that he suffered an amputation of his right leg above the knee. At the time of the collision, the Plaintiff was 45 years old. At that time, the Defendant was 27 years old. The Plaintiff submits that he is entitled to a finding of negligence on the part of the Defendant and concedes that there has been some contributory negligence, which his counsel submits the Court would find in the area of between 20% and 25%. The Defendant submits that there should be no finding of negligence against her, but if the Court does so find, the extent of the Plaintiff's contributory negligence should be…
Continue reading Cook v Siperki
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cook v Siperki [2022] NSWDC 665
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 665
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the defendant breached their duty of care by not maintaining a proper lookout and whether the plaintiff contributed to the accident by exceeding the speed limit. The court considered the plaintiff’s inability to take evasive action due to the defendant's sudden exit and the severity of the injuries. The court also assessed the plaintiff's economic and non-economic losses, including the inability to return to employment in fields requiring relevant experience and the plaintiff's diminished capacity to find suitable work.
After careful consideration, the court found the defendant primarily liable for the accident due to their failure to maintain a proper lookout. The plaintiff was found to be 20% contributory negligent for exceeding the speed limit. The court awarded the plaintiff $1,086,414.48 in compensation, reflecting both economic and non-economic losses. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on the ordinary basis until 14 September 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. I give verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $1,086,414.48.
2. I order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on the ordinary basis to 14 September 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.