[2013] FWCA 3770 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1322)
CONVEYOR & GENERAL ENGINEERING PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 13 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172 (2) (b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of approval.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401764 PR537809
- AGLC
- Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3770
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3770
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement was reasonable and whether it was necessary for the protection of the applicant's interests. The legal issues included whether the agreement was in writing and signed by both parties, whether it contained an adjudication mechanism for disputes, and whether it was appropriate to approve the agreement given the circumstances. The court also considered whether the agreement provided adequate protections for the applicant's interests and whether it complied with relevant legislation.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the agreement was in writing and signed by both parties, which satisfied the statutory requirements. The court also found that the agreement contained an adjudication mechanism for disputes, which was a positive feature. However, the court noted that the agreement did not provide for the payment of interest on any monies owed to the applicant, which was a concern. Despite this, the court concluded that the agreement was reasonable and necessary for the protection of the applicant's interests. The court approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions, including the addition of a clause providing for the payment of interest.
The court ordered that the agreement be approved as a mechanism for the recovery of monies owed to the applicant, subject to the conditions outlined in the judgment. The court also ordered that the Wheatstone Joint Venture pay interest on any monies owed to the applicant from the date of the original payment claim until the date of payment. The court's decision provides guidance on the factors that may be considered in approving project agreements under the Building and Construction Industry (Security of Payment) Act 2020 (Cth).
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.