[2013] FWCA 1751 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Victoria Branch
(AG2013/5614)
CONTINENTAL STEEL PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU RIGGER / STEEL ERECTOR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 21 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Continental Steel Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Rigger / Steel Erector Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Continental Steel Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Rigger / Steel Erector Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 28 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE400401 PR535023>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Victoria Branch [2013] FWCA 1751
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1751
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009 and if it provided for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace issues. Specifically, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement provided for the genuine agreement of the parties, if it complied with the "better off overall test" and if it included appropriate mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes.
The Commission found that the agreement did indeed reflect a genuine agreement between the parties, as it was the product of genuine bargaining. The Commission also held that the agreement satisfied the better off overall test, as it provided for a range of improvements for the employees, including wage increases and other benefits. The Commission was satisfied that the dispute resolution mechanisms in the agreement were appropriate and met the requirements of the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement. The approval was made subject to certain conditions, including the requirement for the parties to provide a copy of the agreement to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.