| [2016] FWCA 7557 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/6415)
UFS UNIT TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS ULTRAFUSE FLOORING SOLUTIONS AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 -2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 19 OCTOBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the UFS UNIT TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/As ULTRAFUSE FLOORING SOLUTIONS and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016 -2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UFS UNIT TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/As ULTRAFUSE FLOORING SOLUTIONS and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016 -2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 October 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE421794 PR586627>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 7557
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 7557
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether it complied with the provisions concerning genuine bargaining, as well as the procedural requirements. This included whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated and whether it met the standards for a bona fide enterprise agreement.
The Commission examined the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process and found that there had been genuine bargaining. It concluded that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and met the criteria for approval. The Commission took into account the complexity of the negotiations, the level of engagement between the parties, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The evidence demonstrated that the union had acted within its powers and that the agreement was representative of the employees' interests.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Ultrafuse Flooring Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018, determining that it complied with the legislative requirements. The Commission found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and was fair and reasonable. The decision confirmed the validity of the agreement, allowing it to be registered and enforced.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.