[2013] FWCA 2220 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/5957)
STEELVISION PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 12 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Steelvision Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Steelvision Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE400730 PR535614>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 2220
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2220
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, including minimum rates of pay and entitlements. The Commission also had to determine if the agreement complied with procedural requirements, such as proper consultation and notice provisions.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement substantially complied with the legislative criteria. The Commission noted that while there were minor procedural issues, these did not significantly impact the fairness or reasonableness of the agreement's terms. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including appropriate pay rates and entitlements, and that it complied with most of the procedural requirements. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, highlighting the importance of procedural compliance in future agreements.
No further orders were made by the Commission beyond the approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.