Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2013] FWCA 2903


[2013] FWCA 2903

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/1072)

TOTAL WATERPROOFING PROJECTS PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 14 MAY 2013

Application for approval of the Total Waterproofing Projects Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 3 May 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Total Waterproofing Projects Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015 (“the Agreement”).

[2] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.

  • Clause 2 seeks to confirm only the operation of the Act in relation to expired agreements. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that nothing further is intended by the clause. I make further comment on this clause below.


  • Clause 3 notes that the Agreement is to apply to employees of the company engaged in construction work and/or for whom the Agreement provides classifications and rates of pay. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that this “and/or” should be read as “and”.


  • Clauses 32.4 and 32.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 40 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 40 is as follows:


    • “The right provided for in subclause 32.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.

      The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 32.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”

[3] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act). However, as noted in that decision, I do not consider this to be a reason for not approving the Agreement. This is particularly so given the clarification provided by the CFMEU noted above.

[4] In relation to clause 41 of the Agreement (“visa compliance”) which refers to apparent obligations upon the employer to do certain things where “temporary foreign labour” is engaged, I note that a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission 1 has found that a clause in such terms as clause 41 of the Agreement is not permitted content, and consequently, cannot impose the obligations upon the employer it seeks to impose.

[1] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[2] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.

[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

 1   Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Baulderstone Pty Ltd[2013] FWC 2671 (O’Callaghan SDP).

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE401181  PR536482>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 2903
Case
[2013] FWCA 2903
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application for the approval of a collective agreement between Total Waterproofing Projects Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The dispute centred on the union's application for approval of a collective agreement that would cover the period from 2011 to 2015. The primary legal issues were whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the requirements for good faith bargaining.

The Commission examined the process of bargaining and the content of the agreement to determine if it was made in good faith and if it complied with the provisions of the Act. It was noted that the union and the employer had engaged in a process of negotiation and that the agreement reflected the outcome of those negotiations. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that it complied with the requirements of the Act. The Commission also found that the agreement contained provisions that were consistent with the objectives of the Act, including provisions for minimum wages and conditions, dispute resolution, and the protection of employees' rights.

In approving the agreement, the Commission noted that it provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both the union and the employer. The agreement provided for a transparent and predictable framework for the regulation of the employment relationship and it included provisions for the protection of employees' rights and interests. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the requirements of the Act and it approved the agreement. The approval of the agreement ensures that the employees of Total Waterproofing Projects Pty Ltd will receive fair and reasonable wages and conditions of employment, and it provides a framework for the resolution of any disputes that may arise in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.