[2013] FWCA 3795 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/1398)
STYLE CARPETS (QLD) PTY LTD T/A STYLE FLOORING XTRA AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 14 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Style Carpets (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Style Flooring Xtra and CFMEU Union collective agreement 2012-2016.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 5 June 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Style Carpets (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Style Flooring Xtra and CFMEU Union collective agreement 2012-2016 (“the Agreement”).
[2] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clause 2 seeks to confirm only the operation of the Act in relation to expired agreements. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that nothing further is intended by the clause. I make further comment on this clause below.
- Clause 3 notes that the Agreement is to apply to employees of the company engaged in construction work and/or for whom the Agreement provides classifications and rates of pay. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that this “and/or” should be read as “and”.
- Clauses 31.4 and 31.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 39 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 39 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 31.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 31.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[1] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act). However, as noted in that decision, I do not consider this to be a reason for not approving the Agreement. This is particularly so given the clarification provided by the CFMEU noted above.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401780 PR537835>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 3795
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3795
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the court had to address was whether the collective agreement met the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement contained the necessary provisions to be considered a "good faith" agreement, and whether it complied with the statutory obligations outlined in the Act. The court also had to consider if the agreement provided for the resolution of any potential future disputes and if it aligned with the broader objectives of the Act, including promoting harmonious, productive and cooperative workplace relationships.
The court, after examining the collective agreement in detail, found that it contained the necessary provisions to be considered a good faith agreement. It met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the provision for the resolution of future disputes and the promotion of cooperative workplace relationships. The agreement was also found to comply with all statutory obligations. The court was satisfied that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both parties, and would facilitate productive and harmonious workplace relations during the period it was in effect.
As a result of the court's findings, the application for approval of the collective agreement between the CFMEU and Style Carpets (Qld) Pty Ltd was approved. The court ordered that the agreement be recognised as a valid and enforceable collective agreement between the parties for the specified period. This decision ensures that the agreement will be upheld and that both parties are bound by its terms, promoting fair and productive workplace relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.