[2013] FWCA 3932 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/1489)
CLASSIC STONE QLD PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Classic Stone Qld Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 13 June 2013 by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (“the CFMEU”) for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Classic Stone Qld Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2011-2015 (“the Agreement”).
[2] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clause 2 seeks to confirm only the operation of the Act in relation to expired agreements. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that nothing further is intended by the clause. I make further comment on this clause below.
- Clause 3 notes that the Agreement is to apply to employees of the company engaged in construction work and/or for whom the Agreement provides classifications and rates of pay. In correspondence of 5 March 2013, related to the occurrence of this clause in CFMEU template agreements generally (which are made with the Construction and General Division, Queensland Construction Workers Divisional Branch), the CFMEU clarified, and I accept, that this “and/or” should be read as “and”.
- Clauses 32.4 and 32.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 40 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 40 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 32.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 32.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[1] Regarding clause 2 of the Agreement, I noted in a previous decision - [2013] FWC 1462 - regarding the CFMEU template agreement that I do not consider the clause, as it purports to regulate the making of a future agreement, to be permitted content (because it does not meet the preconditions specified at s.172 of the Act). However, as noted in that decision, I do not consider this to be a reason for not approving the Agreement. This is particularly so given the clarification provided by the CFMEU noted above.
[2] In relation to clause 41 of the Agreement (“visa compliance”) which refers to apparent obligations upon the employer to do certain things where “temporary foreign labour” is engaged, I note that a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission 1 has found that a clause in such terms as clause 41 of the Agreement is not permitted content, and consequently, cannot impose the obligations upon the employer it seeks to impose.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Baulderstone Pty Ltd[2013] FWC 2671 (O’Callaghan SDP).
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401870 PR537994>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 3932
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3932
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to resolve included whether the agreement demonstrated evidence of good faith bargaining, as mandated by section 228 of the Act, and whether the terms of the agreement were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to avoiding unnecessary complexity or duplication. The court also had to consider if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, taking into account the need for a balance between the rights and interests of both employers and employees.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the process through which the agreement was negotiated and concluded that the CFMEU had engaged in good faith bargaining with Classic Stone. The Commission found that the agreement contained terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, and did not unnecessarily complicate or duplicate existing industrial instruments. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the requirements of the Act, including the need for simplicity and the avoidance of unnecessary complexity. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, noting its balanced approach to the rights and interests of both parties.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the CFMEU and Classic Stone Qld Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2011-2015, with the agreement to be registered with the Fair Work Commission. This decision underscored the importance of good faith bargaining and the need for industrial agreements to be fair and reasonable, while also ensuring that they do not introduce unnecessary complexity or duplication into the industrial relations system.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.