[2013] FWCA 6628 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2013/8932)
DYNAMIC WINDOW SYSTEMS PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU SHOP FITTING MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 6 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Dynamic Window Systems Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Shop Fitting Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Dynamic Window Systems Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Shop Fitting Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 13 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2014.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE403786 PR541338>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FWCA 6628
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6628
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined several aspects of the agreement, including the provisions on wages, working hours, leave entitlements, and the process for resolving disputes. The CFMEU argued that the agreement was fair and met the statutory requirements, while Dynamic Window Systems Pty Ltd contended that certain provisions were unreasonable and did not comply with the Act. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including expert testimony on industry standards and the impact of the agreement on the business operations.
After careful consideration of the arguments and evidence, the court concluded that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court found that some of the provisions were unreasonable as they did not provide for fair and reasonable minimum terms and conditions, and they did not adequately address the procedural fairness obligations under the Act. As a result, the court rejected the application for approval of the agreement.
The final orders of the court were that the application for approval of the CFMEU Shop Fitting Manufacturing Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 was dismissed. The court directed that the agreement would not be approved and would not have effect as a registered agreement. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions provided in the agreement do not become legally binding on the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.