[2014] FWCA 4250 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/1375)
THE LAMINEX GROUP (CFMEU) PROSPECT DISTRIBUTION CENTRE AGREEMENT 2014
Timber and paper products industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 26 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of The Laminex Group (CFMEU) Prospect Distribution Centre Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as The Laminex Group (CFMEU) Prospect Distribution Centre Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The CFMEU, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, the Laminex Group Pty Ltd has given the undertaking annexed to this decision and to the Agreement. In accordance with ss. 191(1) and 201(3) of the Act I note that the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 July 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 January 2017.
ANNUXURE A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE408793 PR552458>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCA 4250
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties, if it met the procedural fairness requirements, and whether it was a "better off overall" agreement for the employees. The court had to assess if the agreement was made in good faith and if it contained terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable. Additionally, the court examined the procedures followed to ensure the agreement was negotiated fairly and if the employees were adequately represented and informed.
The Full Bench found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and that the procedural fairness requirements were met. The court emphasised that the agreement provided a better overall outcome for the employees, taking into account both financial and non-financial benefits. The commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and that it was made in good faith. As a result, the Full Bench approved the application for the agreement to be registered.
Consequently, the Full Bench approved the application for the Laminex Group (CFMEU) Prospect Distribution Centre Agreement 2014 to be registered, confirming that the agreement met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.