DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/8276)

FOXVILLE PROJECTS GROUP (NSW) PTY LTD / CFMEU TRADES COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN	SYDNEY, 16 DECEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the Foxville Projects Group (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Trades Collective Agreement 2014 - 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Foxville Projects Group (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Trades Collective Agreement 2014 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the Foxville Projects Group (NSW) Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, the dispute centred on the approval of a trades collective agreement for the period 2014-2017. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement should be approved, considering the implications for both the employer and the union. The legal issues at hand involved assessing the fairness and compliance of the agreement with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the protection of employees' rights and the maintenance of a harmonious workplace.

The court examined the terms of the agreement, focusing on whether it provided adequate protections for employees while also ensuring that it was not overly restrictive on the employer's ability to operate efficiently. The court also considered the broader economic context, including the impact of the agreement on the industry and the parties' bargaining power. The decision hinged on a balance between the rights of the employees, represented by the union, and the operational needs of the employer.

The Fair Work Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the protections it provided for employees, the flexibility it afforded to the employer, and the overall impact on the industry. The court found that the agreement met the necessary standards for approval, and thus, it granted the application for approval. The decision was grounded in the principle of maintaining a fair and balanced industrial relationship, ensuring that both parties could operate within a mutually agreed framework that fostered productivity and fairness. The final orders of the court were to approve the trades collective agreement as presented, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement.

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established