| [2014] FWCA 8835 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/9241)
LAING O’ROURKE AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD-BUILDING GROUP (NSW) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | MELBOURNE, 19 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for variation of the Laing O’Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd -Building Group (NSW) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the agreement known as the Laing O’Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd - Building Group (NSW) Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2015 [AE896090] (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union.
[2] The variations to the agreement can be found at Attachment A to this decision.
[3] Subject to a concern that has been addressed by way of an undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application to vary the agreement have been met.
[4] As noted, pursuant to s.212(3), I have accepted undertakings from Laing O’Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd. In accordance with s.213(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking can be found at Attachment B to this decision.
[5] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is also attached.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE896090 PR558718>
Attachment A
Attachment B
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCA 8835
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8835
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues the Commission had to address involved the interpretation of specific provisions in the enterprise agreement, specifically those concerning the classification of employees, the calculation of overtime rates, and the conditions under which penalty rates apply. The union argued that certain clauses were ambiguous and should be interpreted in favour of the employees, while the employer contended that the wording was clear and should be adhered to as written. The Commission needed to determine whether the union's interpretation was reasonable and, if so, how the clauses should be amended.
In its reasoning, the Commission considered the principles of good faith bargaining and the need for a fair interpretation of the agreement. It found that the union's interpretation of certain clauses was reasonable and aligned with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act, which seeks to ensure that employees are not disadvantaged by ambiguous terms in enterprise agreements. The Commission decided to vary the clauses in question to clarify the rights and entitlements of employees, ensuring that they receive the benefits as intended by the agreement. The outcome was a revised enterprise agreement that provided greater clarity and protection for the employees.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the variation of the Laing O’Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd -Building Group (NSW) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015 to reflect the changes agreed upon. This included specific amendments to the clauses concerning employee classification, overtime rates, and penalty rates. The decision was binding on both parties and aimed to provide a fair and transparent framework for employment conditions within the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.