| [2015] FWCA 554 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2014/10415)
SS MGMT GRP PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 21 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the SS MGMT GRP Pty Ltd/CFMEU Collective Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe SS MGMT GRP Pty Ltd/CFMEU Collective Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE412349 PR560321>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FWCA 554
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 554
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the collective agreement fulfilled the requirements of being a "modern award" under the Fair Work Act and whether it provided for the "better off overall test" (BOOT). The Commission had to scrutinise the agreement to ensure it did not undermine the minimum standards set by the modern awards and that it offered employees conditions that were at least as good as, or better than, those provided by the relevant award. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees.
In its decision, the Commission carefully examined the terms of the agreement, highlighting specific clauses that addressed the BOOT. The analysis revealed that the agreement did not provide employees with terms that were worse than those in the applicable modern award. Furthermore, the Commission found that the agreement included provisions that enhanced the rights and protections of employees, thereby satisfying the BOOT. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, recognising its alignment with the legislative framework and its benefits to the workforce.
The Fair Work Commission approved the SS MGMT GRP Pty Ltd/CFMEU Collective Agreement 2014-2017, effective from the date of the decision. This outcome confirmed the agreement's compliance with the statutory requirements and its positive impact on the employees' conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.