Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2015] FWCA 7521


[2015] FWCA 7521
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2015/5922)

QUALITY RIGGING SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2017

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 2 NOVEMBER 2015

Application for approval of the Quality Rigging Services (Australia) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015 - 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Quality Rigging Services (Australia) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 2 November 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 November 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE416452 PR573509>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FWCA 7521
Case
[2015] FWCA 7521
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union filed an application for the approval of a collective agreement with Quality Rigging Services (Australia) Pty Ltd. The agreement in question, dated 2015-2017, was the subject of scrutiny to determine its compliance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and associated regulations. The union sought to have the agreement recognised as a valid and enforceable instrument, capable of being applied to the employees within its scope.

The primary legal issues the Commission was required to address included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including provisions concerning the bargaining process, the scope of the agreement, and the adherence to the good faith bargaining principle. Additionally, the Commission needed to examine if the agreement contained appropriate terms and conditions of employment that were not less favourable than the relevant national safety and wage standards.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement in question did not comply with the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission noted deficiencies in the bargaining process and identified clauses within the agreement that fell short of the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that collective agreements adhere to the principles of good faith bargaining and provide terms and conditions of employment that are at least as favourable as those set out in national safety and wage instruments. As a result, the Commission did not grant approval to the agreement.

Consequently, the Fair Work Commission ruled that the Quality Rigging Services (Australia) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2015-2017 was not approved. This decision underscored the necessity for collective agreements to meet stringent legal criteria to ensure that they are fair, equitable, and compliant with legislative standards.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.