Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2015] FWCA 8123


[2015] FWCA 8123
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2015/6707)

MATTHEW ADAM BAILEY T/A JMB METAL WORKS AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2018

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER ROE

PERTH, 25 NOVEMBER 2015

Application for approval of the Matthew Adam Bailey T/A JMB Metal Works and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2014- 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise Agreement known as the Matthew Adam Bailey T/A JMB Metal Works and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2014 - 2018 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union.

[2] This is a greenfields Agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[4] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 2 December 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE416798  PR574357>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FWCA 8123
Case
[2015] FWCA 8123
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case before the Fair Work Commission, the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) sought approval of a collective agreement with Matthew Adam Bailey, trading as JMB Metal Works, for the period 2014 to 2018. The CFMEU, representing the workers of JMB Metal Works, aimed to secure specific terms and conditions of employment for its members through this collective agreement. The Commission was tasked with evaluating whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the collective agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was made in good faith, if it was free from any prohibited content, and if it adhered to the relevant provisions concerning the bargaining process. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it met the standards for being a “better off overall test” (BOOT) agreement.

After thorough examination of the evidence and submissions, the Commission found that the collective agreement complied with all necessary legal requirements. The Commission determined that the agreement was made in good faith, contained no prohibited content, and was in the best interests of the employees. The agreement also met the BOOT criteria, ensuring that employees were better off overall compared to the applicable award or registered agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the collective agreement, finding it to be fair and reasonable for the specified period.

The Commission’s decision concluded with an order approving the Matthew Adam Bailey T/A JMB Metal Works and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2014-2018, effective from the date of the decision. This order mandated that the agreement be implemented by both parties and enforced by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The approval signified the Commission's satisfaction that the agreement would provide a fair and equitable outcome for the employees while ensuring compliance with the statutory framework governing industrial relations in Australia.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.