[2016] FWCA 64
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union |
| (AG2015/7710) |
SEM WINDOW PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 6 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the SEM WINDOW PTY LTD and the CFMEU Building and
Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
SEM WINDOW PTY LTD and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise
Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair
Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy
Union (CFMEU). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The CFMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice
under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I
note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[2016] FWCA 64
[4] The Agreement was approved on 6 January 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 13 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December
2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE417341 PR575761>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 64
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 64
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act had been met in relation to the approval of the enterprise agreement. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement had been fairly chosen, and if the relevant factors under section 186(3) and (3A) had been appropriately considered. Furthermore, the court needed to confirm that the Agreement was indeed intended to cover the organisation, as required by section 201(2).
In its decision, the court found that the application met all the necessary requirements for the approval of the enterprise agreement. The court was satisfied that the group of employees included in the Agreement was fairly chosen, despite the Agreement not covering all employees of the employer. The factors outlined in section 186(3) and (3A) of the Act were also appropriately considered. Additionally, the court confirmed that the Agreement was intended to cover the organisation, as intended by the CFMEU. Consequently, the Agreement was approved on 6 January 2016 and will operate from 13 January 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 31 December 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.