| [2016] FWCA 3041 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/1121)
LASPINA TRABUCCO & CO. PTY. LTD. AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015-2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 16 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Laspina Trabucco & Co. Pty. Ltd. and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Laspina Trabucco & Co. Pty. Ltd. and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 16 May 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE418938 PR580356>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 3041
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3041
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Fair Work Commission were whether certain provisions of the collective agreement were consistent with the applicable legislative framework and whether the agreement, as a whole, was in the best interests of the employees. Specific focus was placed on clauses relating to wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission also had to consider the balance of power between the parties and whether the agreement unfairly disadvantaged the employer.
In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully examined the provisions of the collective agreement and the objections raised by Laspina Trabucco & Co. Pty. Ltd. The Commission found that while some clauses required modification to address the employer's concerns, the overall agreement could be approved with certain amendments. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining a fair and reasonable balance between the rights and obligations of both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the agreement would not unduly prejudice the employer's business operations. After making the necessary amendments, the Fair Work Commission approved the collective agreement, thereby resolving the dispute.
The Fair Work Commission's final orders included the approval of the collective agreement, subject to the specified amendments. The Commission directed the parties to implement the revised agreement and mandated that any disputes arising from the agreement be resolved through the agreed-upon dispute resolution processes. This decision provided clarity and certainty to both the CFMEU and Laspina Trabucco & Co. Pty. Ltd., enabling them to proceed with the implementation of the collective agreement within the parameters set by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.