| [2016] FWCA 4812 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4457)
VIC CIVIL PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 19 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the VIC CIVIL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the VIC CIVIL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 19 July 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE419980 PR582907>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 4812
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4812
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements for approval, and if it adequately covered the essential terms and conditions of employment. The court also needed to determine whether the agreement provided a safety net for employees and avoided any unfair dismissal provisions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was procedurally sound and met the substantive requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was approved as it contained all the essential terms and conditions of employment and provided a safety net for employees. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not unfairly dismiss employees and was in compliance with the relevant legislative provisions. The court ruled in favour of the applicants and approved the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.