| [2016] FWCA 4804 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4446)
SCAFFOLD LOGISTICS COMMERCIAL PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) CONTRACT SCAFFOLD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 19 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the SCAFFOLD LOGISTICS COMMERCIAL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Contract Scaffold Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SCAFFOLD LOGISTICS COMMERCIAL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Contract Scaffold Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 19 July 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE419976 PR582896>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 4804
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4804
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including wages, leave, and other employment conditions. Additionally, the court examined if the agreement met the criteria for being a simple, streamlined, and fair agreement, as required under the legislation. The union contended that the agreement was in line with the statutory requirements, while the employer raised objections to certain clauses, arguing they were unfair and unreasonable.
The court assessed the agreement clause by clause, focusing on the fairness and reasonableness of the provisions. It considered the implications of the agreement on both employers and employees, and evaluated whether the agreement promoted fair and efficient industrial relations. The court found that, overall, the agreement met the legislative criteria for fairness and reasonableness. It concluded that the provisions, while contentious, were not so unreasonable as to warrant disapproval. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, stating that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The final order of the court was to approve the Scaffold Logistics Commercial Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Contract Scaffold Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018, with the agreement to take effect from the date of the decision. The court's approval ensured that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement would govern the employment relations in the scaffolding industry for the specified period, subject to the conditions of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.