| [2016] FWCA 4840 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4450)
ALLPRO PARTITIONS & CEILINGS PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) PLASTERING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 20 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Allpro Partitions & Ceilings Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Plastering Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Allpro Partitions & Ceilings Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Plastering Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE420000 PR582941>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 4840
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4840
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and if it complied with the formal requirements of the Act. It also had to ensure that the agreement did not discriminate against any individual or group of individuals. The court further considered whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving any disputes that may arise during the term of the agreement.
The court found that the agreement met all the necessary criteria for approval. The agreement was genuine, complied with the formal requirements of the Act, and did not discriminate against any individual or group. The court was satisfied that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving any disputes that may arise during the term of the agreement. The court approved the agreement, and it was registered on 29 June 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.