| [2016] FWCA 5181 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/4638)
TILE EFFECT (VIC) PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) TILELAYERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 -2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 1 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the TILE EFFECT (VIC) PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Tilelayers Enterprise Agreement 2016 -2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TILE EFFECT (VIC) PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Tilelayers Enterprise Agreement 2016 -2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 1 August 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 8 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE420222 PR583499>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 5181
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5181
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement constituted a single interest employer agreement, as required under section 230 of the Fair Work Act 2009. To qualify, the agreement must cover employees who are employed by the employer and are members of the union. The Commission needed to assess whether the union's claim to represent all tilelayers in Victoria was valid, and if the agreement indeed met the criteria for a single interest employer agreement.
The Commission found that the union did not have the requisite membership among tilelayers in Victoria to satisfy the requirements for a single interest employer agreement. The union's claim to represent all tilelayers was not supported by the evidence, as it only had a limited number of members in the tilelaying industry. Consequently, the agreement did not meet the criteria for certification as a single interest employer agreement. The Commission dismissed the application for approval of the agreement.
As a result of the decision, the Fair Work Commission did not certify the Tilelayers Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 as a single interest employer agreement. The agreement was therefore not approved and could not be enforced under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.