| [2016] FWCA 6075 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/5201)
MERCAV CONSTRUCTIONS UNIT TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS MERCAV CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 29 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the Mercav Constructions Unit Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Mercav Constructions Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mercav Constructions Unit Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Mercav Constructions Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 September 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE420783 PR584709>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 6075
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6075
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. This required the court to determine if the agreement provided employees with a "better off overall" outcome compared to the applicable award or modern award, and if it complied with the principles of enterprise bargaining, including good faith and freedom of choice. The court also needed to consider if the agreement contained any unlawful content and if it was appropriately certified by the Australian Building and Construction Commission.
The court found that the agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" as it did not provide employees with a sufficient improvement in their conditions compared to the applicable award. The court further determined that the agreement contained unlawful content, as it included provisions that were not capable of being performed within the terms of the agreement. Consequently, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was dismissed. The court did not make any orders as the application was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.