| [2016] FWCA 6129 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2016/5246)
DEMASI BROS & SONS TRUST (THE TRUSTEE FOR) T/AS DEMASI BROS & SONS AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 30 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the Demasi Bros & Sons Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Demasi Bros & Sons and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Demasi Bros & Sons Trust (The Trustee For) T/As Demasi Bros & Sons and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 September 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE420822 PR584774>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FWCA 6129
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6129
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC examined the proposed agreement's provisions, including wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and other conditions. The FWC found that the agreement did not comply with the BOOT, primarily because the proposed wages and conditions were not sufficiently advantageous to the employees. The tribunal noted that while the agreement included some improvements, these were not enough to outweigh the potential disadvantages to employees, particularly when compared to the protections offered by the applicable award. Consequently, the FWC did not grant approval for the enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission ruled that the proposed enterprise agreement did not satisfy the better off overall test, and therefore, it was not approved. The FWC's decision was based on its assessment that the proposed terms and conditions did not sufficiently improve the employees' overall package of pay and conditions. The tribunal's decision was final and binding, and the enterprise agreement could not proceed without modifications that met the BOOT.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.