Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 1971


[2022] FWC 1971

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union

v

RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd

(B2022/1132)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 26 JULY 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd.

  1. This is an application by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd (the Respondent).

  1. The Respondent initially advised my Chambers that it objected to the protected action ballot order being made on the basis that the Applicant had not been, and was not, genuinely trying to reach an agreement. The Respondent also a raised a concern in relation to the single form of industrial action identified in the draft order and sought an extension of the notice period required for the taking of the industrial action from 3 working days to 7 working days. I determined a Mention should be conducted, during which I discussed the above matters with the parties. Following the Mention, the parties were able to reach a consent position.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Mark Richards of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. I am also satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(a) of the Act being longer than 3 working days and that I should exercise the discretionary power in s.443(5) of the Act and specify a period of 5 working days.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR744184.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR744183>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 1971
Case
[2022] FWC 1971
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union of Australia filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of RTL Mining and Earthworks Pty Ltd. The application was heard by Deputy President Clancy of the Fair Work Commission. The Respondent initially opposed the protected action ballot order on the basis that the Applicant had not been genuinely trying to reach an agreement, and also sought an extension of the notice period for the taking of industrial action from three to seven working days. However, following a Mention where the matter was discussed with the parties, a consent position was reached.

The legal issues before the court included whether the Applicant had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement, and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying a longer notice period for the taking of industrial action. The Deputy President examined the declaration of Mr Mark Richards of the Applicant, which outlined the steps taken by the Applicant in bargaining with the Respondent and confirmed that it had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement. The Deputy President also considered the exceptional circumstances justifying the notice period being longer than three working days.

The Deputy President found that the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act had been met, and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice being longer than three working days. The Deputy President exercised the discretionary power in section 443(5) of the Act and specified a period of five working days. An order has been separately issued in PR744184.

In summary, the Deputy President determined that the Applicant had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement, and that the notice period for the taking of industrial action should be five working days. The court's decision was based on the evidence provided by the Applicant and the exceptional circumstances presented in this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.