Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 2596


[2023] FWC 2596

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
v

Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd

(C2023/4456)

COMMISSIONER RIORDAN

SYDNEY, 5 OCTOBER 2023

Application to deal with a dispute – Recommendation.

  1. The parties appeared before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) on 13 September 2023, in relation to the interpretation of the Patricks Fitness for Work (Drugs and Alcohol) Standard Operating Procedure (Procedure).

  1. Whilst agreement could not be reached during the Conference, the parties agreed that they would accept a recommendation from the Commission in relation to the issue.

  1. It is not in dispute that neither party supported or condoned the attendance at work of any employee, including managers, who may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

  1. Further, the parties were satisfied with the current oral fluid testing regime, as long as it maintained and delivered on its accuracy standards. I am satisfied that the current process of all “non-negative” swab tests and 10% of all tests being further tested in a laboratory ensures the ongoing accuracy of the oral fluid testing regime.

  1. In my opinion, any negative test which tests positive in the laboratory must be processed in accordance with the Procedure. To do otherwise would be contrary to the ambition and focus of the parties in relation to ensuring a safe workplace for all.

  1. Therefore, I recommend the following change to the Procedure: -

Confirmatory Testing A procedure that uses calibrated specialised equipment in a laboratory to identify and quantify the presence of a specific drug or metabolite against the limits in the Australian Standards.

Confirmatory Testing is conducted on all samples that are “Non Negative” and on 10% of the total number of samples. The purpose of Confirmatory Testing is to verify accuracy of testing processes and equipment. Any Positive Result from Confirmatory Testing may result in the Breach Procedure in this document being applied.
  1. Patricks have agreed that they will conduct an education process for all employees in relation to this change. Further, Patricks have agreed that any warning that has been given to any employee over the last 12 months as a result of their negative swab test being reversed in the laboratory, will have that warning removed from their file. However, the arrangements which were put in place for any of these employees to return to work after their positive result will continue, including the requirement for additional testing.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR766979>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 2596
Case
[2023] FWC 2596
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered an application to interpret the Patricks Fitness for Work (Drugs and Alcohol) Standard Operating Procedure between the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Ltd. The dispute centred on the Procedure’s confirmatory testing process, which involves testing a certain percentage of samples in a laboratory to verify the accuracy of the testing process and equipment. The Commission was asked to recommend a resolution to this issue, which both parties agreed to accept.

The legal issue before the Commission was to determine the appropriate action to be taken when a negative swab test result is reversed in laboratory confirmatory testing. The Commission needed to decide whether any positive results from confirmatory testing should be processed in accordance with the Breach Procedure and if any previous warnings issued to employees for such instances should be removed from their files. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider the implications of these decisions on the employees' return to work arrangements, including the requirement for additional testing.

The Commission concluded that any positive result from confirmatory testing should indeed be processed in accordance with the Breach Procedure, as it would be contrary to the parties' goal of maintaining a safe workplace to do otherwise. The Commission also recommended that any previous warnings issued to employees for such instances be removed from their files. However, the Commission noted that the arrangements for employees to return to work after a positive result, including additional testing, would continue. The Commission's recommendation was accepted by Patrick Stevedores, who agreed to conduct an education process for all employees about the changes to the Procedure and to remove any warnings from the files of affected employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.