Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2020] FCAFC 27
•28 February 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 27
[2020] FCAFC 27
28 February 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved a dispute between the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and One Key Workforce Pty Ltd (OKW) over the validity of an enterprise agreement. The CFMMEU sought a declaration that the enterprise agreement was void and of no effect, and the court granted this relief. The primary issue before the court was whether the primary judge's exercise of discretion in ordering the distribution of trust monies was correct. The CFMMEU argued that the primary judge miscarried in his exercise of discretion by having regard to the views of the Full Court, the nature of the proceeding, and a potential contravention of a certain section of the Corporations Act. The court found no error in the primary judge's decision and granted leave to appeal, but ultimately dismissed the appeal.
The court also considered applications to adduce further evidence on appeal. Both parties made applications to adduce further evidence in the appeal, which were not made in conformity with the Federal Court Rules. However, neither party complained about this, and the court decided to dispense with compliance with the relevant rule. The CFMMEU sought to admit an affidavit from a senior national legal officer, which provided details on the proposed settlement and the amounts that CFMMEU members were expected to receive. The court granted leave to both parties to adduce further evidence in the appeal.
The court also considered applications to adduce further evidence on appeal. Both parties made applications to adduce further evidence in the appeal, which were not made in conformity with the Federal Court Rules. However, neither party complained about this, and the court decided to dispense with compliance with the relevant rule. The CFMMEU sought to admit an affidavit from a senior national legal officer, which provided details on the proposed settlement and the amounts that CFMMEU members were expected to receive. The court granted leave to both parties to adduce further evidence in the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Fiduciary Duty
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Roberts-Smith v Roberts [2022] FCA 524
Cases Citing This Decision
8
KTC v David
[2022] FCAFC 60
Furniss v Blue Sky Alternative Investments Limited (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq)
[2022] FCA 1546
Roberts-Smith v Roberts
[2022] FCA 524
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
3
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd
[2019] FCA 153
RECS (QLD) PTY LTD
[2015] FWCA 7516