| [2022] FWC 2940 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
v
Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kimberly Clark
(B2022/1671)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 7 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kimberly Clark.
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kimberly Clark (the Respondent).
On 4 November 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Denise Campbell-Burns of the Applicant, setting out the steps taken by the Applicant in bargaining and the assertion that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An order has been separately issued in PR747654.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR747648>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kimberly Clark [2022] FWC 2940
- Case
- [2022] FWC 2940
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine if the notification time for the proposed agreement was valid and if the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were met. The CFMMEU had to demonstrate that it had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd and that the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate. The court reviewed the declaration of Ms Denise Campbell-Burns of the CFMMEU, which outlined the steps taken by the union in bargaining and its assertion of good faith in attempting to reach an agreement.
After reviewing the material presented, including the declaration of Ms Denise Campbell-Burns, the Deputy President found that the notification time for the proposed agreement was valid and that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The court noted that Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd did not object to the application, which facilitated the decision-making process. Consequently, the Deputy President determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing and issued an order in PR747654.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.