| [2023] FWC 1254 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.739—Dispute resolution
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
v
Brisbane Container Terminals Ltd (BCT) T/A Hutchison Ports Australia
(C2022/2230)
| VICE PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 29 MAY 2023 |
Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES; [s186(6)]
This Decision concerns an application made by the Maritime Union of Australia Division (MUA) of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s. 739 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to deal with a dispute under the dispute resolution procedure in Hutchison Ports Australia (HPA) and Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The dispute is notified by the MUA on behalf of its member, Mr Diego Flaksbard. The Respondent is Brisbane Container Terminals Ltd (BCT) T/A Hutchison Ports Australia, Mr Flaksbard’s employer.
The agreed question for determination and my answer to that question are as follows:
Question:
“In the circumstances of this Application, in issuing the letter to Mr Diego Flaksbard, dated 16 May 2022 (and described as a “Letter of Warning”), did Brisbane Container Terminals Limited act “unfairly” (in whole or in part) towards Mr Diego Flaksbard as referred to in subclause 22.1 of the Hutchison Ports Australia (HPA) and Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) Enterprise Agreement 2021?”
Answer:
Yes.
Reasons for Decision will be issued separately.
VICE PRESIDENT
Appearances:
Mr K Bond of the Maritime Union of Australia Division of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, the Applicant.
Mr P Brown of Baker & McKenzie, for the Respondent.
Hearing details:
2022.
Brisbane.
13, 14 September.
Final written submissions:
Applicant, 1 November 2022.
Respondent, 15 November 2022.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR762585>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Brisbane Container Terminals Ltd (BCT) T/A Hutchison Ports Australia [2023] FWC 1254
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1254
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether BCT acted unfairly in issuing the Letter of Warning to Mr Flaksbard. This was assessed against the backdrop of subclause 22.1 of the Enterprise Agreement, which requires that disciplinary action be fair. The FWC had to determine if BCT's actions met the standard of fairness as required by the Agreement. This involved a careful review of the circumstances leading to the issuance of the Letter of Warning, the content of the letter itself, and the application of the relevant provisions of the Enterprise Agreement.
In its decision, the FWC found that BCT did act unfairly towards Mr Flaksbard in issuing the Letter of Warning. The reasoning was based on the specific circumstances of the case, the content of the letter, and the application of subclause 22.1 of the Enterprise Agreement. The FWC concluded that BCT's actions did not meet the standard of fairness required by the Enterprise Agreement. As a result, the FWC ruled in favour of the MUA, finding that BCT had indeed acted unfairly in whole or in part.
The final orders of the FWC will be issued separately, detailing the specific remedies and any further actions required by BCT to address the unfair conduct.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.