| [2023] FWC 2867 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union - The Maritime Union of Australia Division
v
GeelongPort Pty Ltd
(B2023/1194)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | SYDNEY, 1 NOVEMBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of GeelongPort Pty Ltd.
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of GeelongPort Pty Ltd (GeelongPort or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation the same proposed agreement.[1]
On 1 November 2023, the Commission was advised, in effect, that GeelongPort did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of David Ball, Deputy Victorian Branch Secretary, The Maritime Union of Australia, setting out the steps taken by the CFMMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with GeelongPort, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 14 December 2023.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An order has been separately issued in PR767809.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference in conjunction with the related matter (B2023/1195). That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2023/1195.
[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR767810>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union the Maritime Union of Australia Division v GeelongPort Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 2867
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2867
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court reviewed the declaration by David Ball, Deputy Victorian Branch Secretary of The Maritime Union of Australia, which outlined the union's efforts to negotiate with GeelongPort. The declaration affirmed that the CFMMEU had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement. Given the documentation and the absence of objections from GeelongPort, the Deputy President concluded that all requirements for the ballot order were met. The Australian Electoral Commission was designated to conduct the ballot, with the voting period set to close on 14 December 2023. This date was established to allow the Australian Electoral Commission sufficient time to conduct the ballot, aligning with the 30 working days required by the Act.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order for the ballot and determined the date by which voting must close. Additionally, a compulsory conciliation conference was scheduled to be conducted by another Member of the Commission, in conjunction with a related matter. Directions were anticipated to ensure that all bargaining representatives would attend the conference ready to engage in meaningful negotiations. This decision ensures that the procedural requirements for the ballot are met, allowing the CFMMEU to proceed with the industrial action ballot as planned.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.