Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union & Ors v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner

CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MARITIME, MINING AND ENERGY UNION & ORS
v
AUSTRALIAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER & ANOR
[2021] HCASL 60
B79/2020

The applicants require an extension of time to apply for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. There is no basis to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court to warrant the grant of special leave. In relation to the first proposed ground of appeal, the Full Court applied the decision in Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Powell (2017) 251 FCR 470. The second proposed ground raises no question of principle. It would be futile to grant the extension of time sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

M.M. Gordon J.J. Edelman

8 April 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union & Ors v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner, the applicants sought an extension of time to apply for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute involved a consideration of the applicants' ability to appeal the Full Court's decision and the grounds upon which such an appeal could be based. The High Court was tasked with determining whether special leave to appeal should be granted, considering the merits of the proposed grounds of appeal.

The legal issues before the court included whether the Full Court's decision was correct and whether the proposed grounds of appeal warranted an extension of time. Specifically, the applicants argued that the Full Court's application of a previous decision was incorrect and that there was a valid basis to question the Full Court's ruling. The court was required to assess the correctness of the Full Court's decision and whether the proposed grounds of appeal raised sufficient issues of principle to merit further consideration.

In its reasoning, the court noted that there was no basis to doubt the correctness of the Full Court's decision. The Full Court had correctly applied the decision in Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Powell (2017) 251 FCR 470. The second proposed ground of appeal did not raise any questions of principle, and therefore, it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought. The court concluded that special leave should be refused as there was no valid basis for the extension of time to apply for special leave.

Consequently, the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application with costs. This decision was made on 8 April 2021 by Justices M.M. Gordon and J.J. Edelman.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established