Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2022] FWCA 2578


[2022] FWCA 2578

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union

(AG2022/3072)

PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING AND DRAFTING PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SUBCONTRACTORS STEELFIXING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020-2023

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 3 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING AND DRAFTING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Steelfixing Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING AND DRAFTING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Steelfixing Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The title of the Agreement in the Notice of Employee Representational Rights was different to the title clause in the proposed Agreement. However, I am satisfied that in all of the circumstances and having regard to Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[1], this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purpose of s.188(2)(a). Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to be disadvantaged by the error.

  1. The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516852  PR744364>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 2578
Case
[2022] FWCA 2578
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) sought approval of a subcontractor's enterprise agreement between Performance Engineering and Drafting Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division). The dispute centred on whether the agreement met the legal requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the CFMEU had to demonstrate that the agreement contained the mandated minimum terms and conditions and was made in good faith.

The Commission needed to examine whether the agreement adhered to the statutory minimum terms and conditions outlined in the Fair Work Act, and whether the process of making the agreement was conducted in good faith. The CFMEU argued that all necessary minimum terms and conditions were included, and the agreement was formed through a process that met the good faith requirement. The Commission evaluated the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on the procedural integrity of the agreement's formation and its compliance with the minimum standards.

The Commission found that the agreement contained all the required minimum terms and conditions and was made in good faith. The process of negotiating and finalising the agreement was deemed to be procedurally sound. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, concluding that it met all necessary legal criteria. The Commission's decision was based on the comprehensive evidence provided and the adherence to the legal standards set out in the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.