| [2022] FWCA 3224 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/3729)
HANDS ON PAVING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Concrete Kerb and Channel Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the HANDS ON PAVING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Concrete Kerb and Channel Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the HANDS ON PAVING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Concrete Kerb and Channel Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 September 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517450 PR745903>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 3224
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3224
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the proposed agreement's terms and conditions, comparing them against the relevant award provisions and national minimum standards. The Commission also considered the adequacy of the dispute resolution mechanisms within the agreement. After careful consideration, the Commission determined that the proposed agreement did not meet the criteria for safety net approval. The Commission found that certain terms and conditions in the agreement were less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award, and therefore did not meet the safety net standard. Additionally, the Commission was not satisfied that the dispute resolution provisions were appropriate.
Consequently, the application for approval was rejected. The Fair Work Commission concluded that the proposed enterprise agreement did not meet the necessary standards for safety net approval and thus could not be approved under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission's decision stands as a reminder of the stringent requirements for safety net agreements and the importance of ensuring that all terms and conditions meet or exceed national minimum standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.