| [2023] FWCA 608 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2023/381)
TOP TIER CAULKING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Caulking and Sealing Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 3 mARCH 2023 |
Application for approval of the TOP TIER CAULKING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Caulking and Sealing Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TOP TIER CAULKING PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Caulking and Sealing Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 March 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519305 PR751143>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2023] FWCA 608
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 608
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the FWC was correct in rejecting the application for approval. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The focus was on whether the agreement met the criteria for "better off overall and in the round" (BOOT), which ensures that employees are not disadvantaged by the terms of the agreement. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and whether it was made in accordance with the law.
The court found that the FWC's decision to reject the application was not unreasonable. The court held that the agreement did not sufficiently demonstrate that the caulkers would be better off overall and in the round compared to the existing conditions. Furthermore, the court noted that the agreement did not adequately address the issue of casual loading, which was a significant concern for the employees. The court concluded that the FWC had appropriately exercised its discretion in rejecting the application, and the appeal was dismissed. Consequently, the agreement was not approved by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.