| [2018] FWCA 2834 [Note: a correction has been issued to this document] |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2018/1614)
BLOC (ACT) PTY LTD AND CFMEU ACT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Australian Capital Territory | |
COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 21 MAY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Bloc (ACT) Pty Ltd and CFMEU ACT Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bloc (ACT) Pty Ltd and CFMEU ACT Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 21 May 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 28 May 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428423 PR607250>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FWCA 2834
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2834
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the agreement contained the required minimum terms, did not mandate or prohibit membership in a particular union, and complied with the "better off overall test" to ensure that it provided employees with no less favourable terms and conditions than the applicable awards or other relevant agreements.
The Commission found that the agreement did meet the legislative requirements for approval. It contained the necessary minimum terms, allowed for freedom of association, and passed the better off overall test. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided employees with a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions, and thus approved the enterprise agreement. The decision was made in the interest of maintaining good industrial relations and ensuring that the agreement would operate effectively within the legal framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.