Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union

Case [2019] FWCA 4703


[2019] FWCA 4703
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2019/2333)

WAGSTAFF PILING PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2019

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 5 JULY 2019

Application for variation of the Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2018 - 2019

[1] On 1 July 2019 the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) applied to vary the Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2018 - 2019 (the Agreement) under s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The CFMMEU seeks to vary clause 5.2 of appendix 4 of the Agreement, which sets out the employer’s Impairment Policy. It currently reads:

“5.2   Employees shall:

(a) Co-operate reasonably with the employer in the implementation of this policy;

(b) If any employee reasonably believes that any person on the site may be a health and safety risk to themselves or others they should inform their employer and their relevant Preliminary Impairment Assessor (PIA) of this belief;

(c) Not possess, consume, or be under the influence of, alcohol or other drugs while

working;

(d) Ensure that they do not work, if they believe that they may be impaired;

(e) Consult their doctor or pharmacist about possible side effects of using prescribed or over-the-counter medication;

(f) Inform their employer, their Preliminary Impairment Assessor (PIA); and

(g) Delegate, if they have been made aware by their treating doctor or pharmacist of possible impairment as a side effect of medication, or if they feel impaired by medication.” (Emphasis added)

[3] In particular, the variation sought by the CFMMEU relates to clause 5.2 (f) and (g).  The CFMMEU submitted that the words “; and (g) Delegate,” were the result of a clerical error and were not intended to be included in the Agreement by the parties covered by it. Clause 5.2 (f) requires an ‘and’ in place of the first comma after ‘employer’ to clarify its meaning. Further, it is submitted that read independently, (f) and (g) are not complete phrases and do not make sense.

[4] The proposed variation would remove the words ‘and’ and ‘Delegate’ and merge clauses 5.2(f) and cl 5.2 (g) into a single clause.

[5] The employer consents to the proposed changes.

[6] Having regard to the consent position and the benefit of making cl 5.2 (f) a complete phrase, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of section 217 of the Acthave been met.

[7] In order to remove uncertainty in relation to the particular provisions of the Agreement, the Agreement is varied as follows:

1. Delete clause 5.2(f) and clause 5.2(g) from Appendix 4.

    2. Insert clause 5.2(f) into Appendix 4, which will now read:

“5.2(f) Inform their employer and their Preliminary Impairment Assessor (PIA) if they have been made aware by their treating doctor or pharmacist of possible impairment as a side effect of medication, or if they feel impaired by medication.”

[8] Accordingly, the application is granted and the variation, as sought, will operate from today, 5 July 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE503574  PR710073>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FWCA 4703
Case
[2019] FWCA 4703
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved an application for variation of the collective agreement between Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which has the authority to resolve disputes related to workplace agreements in Australia. The CFMEU sought changes to the existing agreement, aiming to address specific issues arising from the application's provisions.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed variations were necessary and reasonable in the context of the existing agreement. The Commission had to assess whether the changes were appropriate in light of the parties' obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 and the terms of the existing collective agreement. It was also necessary to consider whether the variations would result in improved working conditions or fair outcomes for the employees.

The Commission determined that the proposed variations were necessary and reasonable. It concluded that the changes were consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act, which aims to promote harmonious, productive, and fair workplace relations. The Commission found that the variations addressed specific issues that were not adequately covered by the existing agreement and that they would result in fairer outcomes for the employees. The application was thus approved, and the collective agreement was varied accordingly.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the collective agreement between Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and the CFMEU be varied as per the application. The variations included changes to the provisions related to employee entitlements, working hours, and certain procedural aspects. The Commission emphasised that the variations were intended to address specific issues and improve the fairness and effectiveness of the agreement for all parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.