| [2019] FWCA 6625 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2019/3303)
WACO KWIKFORM LIMITED (QUEENS WHARF PROJECT) UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Waco Kwikform Limited (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Waco Kwikform Limited (Queens Wharf Project) Union Collective Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505429 PR712714>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FWCA 6625
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6625
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission assessed the agreement in light of the relevant legislative and regulatory framework, considering the principles of fairness, equity and the broader economic context. The applicant union argued that the proposed agreement was necessary to safeguard the rights and interests of its members, while the employer contended that some provisions were excessively restrictive and detrimental to the business. After careful consideration of the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that, while some aspects of the agreement could be improved, the overall balance of the agreement was fair and reasonable. The Commission approved the Union Collective Agreement 2018, subject to certain modifications to address specific concerns raised during the hearing. These modifications primarily involved the clarification and adjustment of certain provisions to ensure a fair and balanced outcome for both the employees and the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.