| [2019] FWCA 8124 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2019/4436)
RAVEN SCAFFOLDS PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) CONTRACT SCAFFOLD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019-2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 29 NOVEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the RAVEN SCAFFOLDS PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Contract Scaffold Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RAVEN SCAFFOLDS PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Contract Scaffold Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 December 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506279 PR714727>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FWCA 8124
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 8124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the enterprise agreement contained any provisions that were not in the best interests of the employees, whether the agreement had been negotiated in good faith, and if the agreement met the requirements for simplification and clarity. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the agreement provided adequate protection for employees and if it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act.
In delivering its decision, the court meticulously examined each clause of the agreement, balancing the rights of the employer and the employees. The court found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting all the statutory criteria for approval. It concluded that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and provided sufficient protections for employees, including provisions for redundancy and termination. The court also noted the simplification efforts made in the agreement, which aligned with legislative intent to reduce complexity in enterprise agreements.
The court approved the enterprise agreement, subject to the conditions specified in the decision. The approval was granted on the understanding that the agreement would be implemented and enforced as per the terms set out in the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.