| [2020] FWCA 6646 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2020/3624)
CITY RENDERING PTY. LIMITED / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2019-2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 10 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the City Rendering Pty. Limited / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the City Rendering Pty. Limited / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 December 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509768 PR725311>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2020] FWCA 6646
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6646
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed collective agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the agreement adhered to the provisions concerning the terms and conditions of employment, including minimum wages, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and procedural fairness. Furthermore, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement contained any provisions that might be deemed contrary to public policy or otherwise unenforceable.
In rendering its decision, the Commission carefully examined the provisions of the Fair Work Act and relevant regulations. It found that the proposed collective agreement largely met the statutory requirements, with some minor adjustments necessary to ensure compliance with minimum wage standards and procedural fairness. The Commission highlighted that the agreement provided for adequate terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable for the employees, while also addressing the legitimate interests of the employer. Ultimately, the Commission approved the collective agreement with the stipulation that certain amendments be made to align with the statutory minimum standards. Consequently, the agreement was approved, effective from the date of the Commission’s decision.
No further orders were made by the Commission beyond the approval of the collective agreement subject to the specified amendments. The decision reinforces the importance of ensuring that collective agreements comply with statutory requirements to maintain a balanced and fair industrial relationship.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.