| [2021] FWCA 3493 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/5534)
M.L STEEL FIXING PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2019-2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 17 JUNE 2021 |
Application for variation of the M.L Steel Fixing Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the M.L Steel Fixing Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made by Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] A variation was made to the title of the Agreement and throughout the Agreement which replaces the original Agreement title M.L Steel Fixing Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2022 with the following:
M.L Steel Fixing Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2023
[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 June 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE508054 PR730807>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 3493
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 3493
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission carefully examined the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on the financial stability of M.L Steel Fixing Pty Ltd and the broader economic conditions affecting the industry. The company argued that without the proposed variations, it would face substantial financial hardship, potentially leading to job losses and the closure of its operations. The CFMEU, on the other hand, contended that the changes sought by the company amounted to an unfair reduction in employee entitlements and conditions. After weighing the arguments and considering the evidence, the Commission concluded that the application did not meet the statutory criteria for a variation, as the changes sought were not necessary to ensure the ongoing viability of the business.
As a result, the Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for variation. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining fair and equitable employment conditions, particularly in times of economic uncertainty. It also highlighted the need for parties to engage in good faith negotiations to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. The decision underscores the principle that while businesses must adapt to economic changes, such adaptations must be balanced against the rights and protections of employees as enshrined in collective agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.