| [2021] FWCA 4599 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/6295)
CUTRITE COMMERCIAL PTY LTD SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND CORRECTIONAL PRECINCT STAGE 2 PROJECT GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 29 JULY 2021 |
Application for approval of the Cutrite Commercial Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Greenfields Agreement 2020.
[1] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cutrite Commercial Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Greenfields Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMMEU, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it, and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] I note that pursuant to s 53(2)(b) of the Act, the Agreement was made with the CFMMEU, the CEPU and the AMWU and that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 29 July 2021 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 5 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512514 PR732274>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 4599
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 4599
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the QBCC had the authority to approve the agreement and whether the approval process was lawful. The CFMEU argued that the QBCC did not have the authority to approve the agreement, and that the approval process was flawed as it did not allow for proper consultation with relevant parties. The QBCC, on the other hand, argued that it had the authority to approve the agreement and that the approval process was lawful.
The court held that the QBCC did have the authority to approve the agreement and that the approval process was lawful. The court found that the CFMEU had not demonstrated that the approval process was flawed or that the decision of the QBCC was not in accordance with the law. The court further held that the CFMEU had not demonstrated that the approval of the agreement would result in any significant detriment to the interests of the union or its members. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the approval of the agreement was upheld.
The final orders of the court were that the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision of the QBCC to approve the agreement be upheld. The court also ordered that the CFMEU pay the costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.