| [2021] FWCA 7161 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/8743)
MULHERIN RIGGING & CRANES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND CFMEU UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2020-2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 16 DECEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Mulherin Rigging & Cranes Australia Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020-2022
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mulherin Rigging & Cranes Australia Pty Ltd and CFMEU Union Collective Agreement 2020-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 December 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514324 PR736843>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 7161
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 7161
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues were whether the terms of the agreement were consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether they provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The CFMEU argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while Mulherin Rigging & Cranes Australia Pty Ltd contested certain provisions, claiming they were unreasonable and did not meet the statutory requirements.
The Commission carefully examined the provisions of the agreement, considering the principles of good faith bargaining and the public interest in maintaining industrial harmony. After thorough deliberation, the Commission determined that the majority of the agreement's terms were fair and reasonable, reflecting a balance of interests between the employer and the employees. However, certain provisions were found to be unreasonable and were not approved.
The Commission approved the collective agreement, subject to the modifications necessary to remove the unreasonable terms. The decision was made in the interest of ensuring fair and reasonable terms for employees while maintaining industrial harmony.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.