| [2021] FWCA 7240 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2021/8860)
SOUTHERN LABOUR HIRE PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE STEELFIXING AGREEMENT 2019-2023
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 21 DECEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Southern Labour Hire Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Steelfixing Agreement 2019-2023
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Southern Labour Hire Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Steelfixing Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 December 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514399 PR737002>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCA 7240
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 7240
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the agreement was genuinely a collective agreement, was free from any improper conduct, and contained terms that were fair and reasonable. The court had to consider the balance of power between the employer and the union, the transparency of the agreement, and the potential impact on employees.
In its reasoning, the court found that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The court highlighted several issues, including concerns about the representation of the employees and the potential for the agreement to disadvantage workers. The court noted that the agreement lacked proper consultation and transparency, and it did not adequately protect the interests of the employees. Consequently, the court determined that the agreement was not genuinely a collective agreement and did not meet the necessary standards for approval.
The court's decision resulted in the refusal to approve the agreement. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that any collective agreement is genuinely representative of the employees and is fair and reasonable. The court's decision underscores the necessity for proper consultation and transparency in the negotiation and approval of collective agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.